Orpha (Ron) Cunningham

David Porreca

 

David Kuzma

Rick LeFaivre

Stan Siegel

 

Arthur C. Aikin

Brian Barry

Ernest F. Blasé

Austin Bordeaux

Daniel J. Boyle

Jim Channon

William C. Comee

Hans Davidsson

Michael Doerr

Tom Duvall

Jerald L. Feinstein

Fernando Fernandez

Liane Gabora

George Gagen

Karl T. Gould

Ken Hales

Peter M. Hekman

William T. Hodson

J. Morgan Jellet

Karl B. Keller

Gary Luick

Larry Mercer

Riley D. Mixson

Bob Welty

Yan M. Yufik

 

Brian Barry

Zazi Fellow

Brian Barry is an independent consultant who analyzes problems in the areas of personnel management, logistics and maintenance for the Department of Defense. Utilizing a methodology developed at MIT, Mr. Barry produces models that replicate problematic behavior and then uses the models to define winning strategies.

After graduation from the United States Naval Academy, Mr. Barry spent twenty years on active duty with tours of duty that included service as Main Propulsion Assistant on a nuclear powered aircraft carrier, Engineer Officer of a nuclear powered cruiser, and Commanding Officer of a destroyer.

After leaving the Navy he became a partner in a start-up engineering and professional services company. This company provided software application development, network design, installation, operations and maintenance services as well as various other business services, mainly to the Department of Defense. Acting as Chief Operating Officer, he contributed to the rapid growth of the company to annual revenues of $60M. The company was sold to a publicly traded company in October, 2001 at which point Mr. Barry began acting as an independent consultant.

Mr. Barry received training in the techniques of System Dynamics from MIT and has been actively practicing these methods for over five years. He has produced models that described the impact of retention and attrition patterns on manning levels within the Navy’s submarine force, the wasted effort and depreciated dollars that result when standard Defense Department budgeting calculation methods are employed for O&M budgeting, the impact of late funding and erratic loading of repair activities on the cost of maintenance, the reason the Navy personnel and training commands find it difficult to generate inventories of newly defined skills within reasonable periods of time, and the causes of endemic interface problems within an important ship design and production organization.

return to top